News Summary

Las Vegas officials, led by Mayor Shelley Berkley, reject the Department of Homeland Security’s classification of the city as a sanctuary jurisdiction. Mayor Berkley asserts that Las Vegas complies with federal immigration laws and questions the criteria that led to this designation. Both the mayor and Governor Joe Lombardo’s office emphasize the city’s cooperation with federal immigration authorities, while local leaders express concerns over potential federal funding cuts due to this classification. The ambiguity surrounding ‘sanctuary cities’ complicates ongoing discussions on immigration policy.

Las Vegas has found itself at the center of a national dialogue over immigration enforcement after the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) designated the city as a sanctuary jurisdiction. This classification suggests that Las Vegas is obstructing federal efforts to enforce immigration laws, a claim that officials, including Mayor Shelley Berkley, firmly deny.

Mayor Berkley has publicly rejected the DHS designation, asserting that Las Vegas has never operated as a sanctuary city. In response to the federal classification, she has reached out to the DHS to request the removal of the city from their controversial list, which includes other jurisdictions across the country. Despite the federal government’s assertions, Berkley noted that the city has yet to receive any formal notification regarding its sanctuary status.

The mayor expressed confusion over how the DHS arrived at its classification, specifically questioning the criteria used and the individuals or methods involved in compiling the list. She emphasized that Las Vegas complies with federal laws relating to immigration enforcement while clarifying that the Metro Police department does not engage in federal immigration enforcement tasks.

In support of this stance, Governor Joe Lombardo’s office reiterated that Nevada is not classified as a sanctuary state and emphasized the city’s cooperation with federal immigration authorities. This aligns with previous statements from Metro Police, which indicated that while they would not participate in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations concerning undocumented individuals, they would inform ICE during the booking process if an individual charged with certain violent crimes was found to be a foreign-born person.

The DHS explained their classification of jurisdictions like Las Vegas stems from various factors, such as perceived noncompliance with federal laws, limitations on sharing information, and legal protections afforded to undocumented individuals. These factors have led to concerns among city leaders about potential repercussions, including cuts to federal funding that could negatively affect local services.

Dr. Rebecca Gill, a political science professor at UNLV, noted that the terminology surrounding “sanctuary cities” has become increasingly complex, particularly during the Trump administration. This ambiguity raises questions about what it truly means for a city to be designated as a sanctuary, complicating discussions about immigration policy on both a local and national level.

As the city approaches further discussions, Mayor Berkley emphasized her intention to maintain open lines of communication with federal authorities to address the misconceptions associated with Las Vegas’s designation. The DHS maintains that jurisdictions listed for non-compliance will receive formal notifications, a protocol that has yet to be enacted in the case of Las Vegas.

The matter has spurred debates among local leadership, many of whom have also contested their inclusion on the DHS list, mirroring Baltimore’s mayor’s similar concerns with their own classification. Additionally, questions continue to arise regarding the specific definition of “Las Vegas City” in the DHS’s designation, leading to further speculation about the intended meaning and implications for the community served by the city government.

As the DHS commits to updating the list of sanctuary jurisdictions based on compliance assessments, Las Vegas continues to navigate this intricate landscape, weighing the effects of federal classifications on local governance, community relations, and vital funding streams. The ongoing dialogue reflects both local and national sentiments surrounding immigration enforcement and the responsibilities of city officials in this contentious area of public policy.

Las Vegas Challenges DHS Sanctuary City Classification

News Summary

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

HERE Resources

Additional Resources

Author: HERE Las Vegas